![]() ![]() ![]() It is important to ensure both internal and external coherence. One can elaborate further to suggest that since the common strategic goal of peacebuilding is to reduce and avoid further tensions by targeting root causes of conflict, coherence in this regard would be important to guide all peacebuilding strategies towards the prevention of further conflict and contributing to political, economic, cultural and societal transformation to achieve positive or structural peace. …the effort to direct the wide range of activities undertaken in the political, governance, development, human rights, humanitarian, rule of law and security dimensions of a peacebuilding system towards common strategic objectives. 4 When this definition is applied to peacebuilding, coherence can be understood as: 3 In its most developed form, it suggests the synchronisation of objectives, strategies and implementation of programmes by relevant actors so that they are all in agreement on the need to pursue common goals. One stream of thought is that in order to enhance and make peacebuilding initiatives more effective, greater coherence and coordination among actors is needed.Īccording to Donini, Niland and Wermester, coherence, in its simplest form, refers to the attempt to ‘coordinate, bring together, or join political intervention with other relevant types of action, including humanitarian and human rights actions’. This generally results in unclear objectives and the duplication of activities and efforts. 2 These initiatives, however, are not always coherent amongst themselves and often have the unintended effect of creating a sense of confusion among and competition between actors, leading to the development and implementation of uncoordinated strategies that are less than optimal. Over the years, a series of international, regional and national peacebuilding-related policy processes have been initiated and, together, these advances have generated a common space where several layers of actors working in peacebuilding at international, national, regional and local level interact. Unpacking coherence within the peace-building context ![]() ![]() Finally, the PPB provides some recommended principles that should characterise peacebuilding interventions as a way to support local and international actors in developing coherent, effective and sustainable peacebuilding efforts. Secondly, it will examine the various challenges hampering achievement of coherence and coordination. Firstly, the brief seeks to establish a common understanding of the term ‘coherence’ which is specific to peacebuilding dynamics by unpacking its meaning within peacebuilding experiences. It aims to examine whether greater coherence and coordination is necessarily the answer to ensure the achievement of more effective and sustainable peacebuilding initiatives. This Policy & Practice Brief (PPB) is based on the outcomes of a seminar hosted by the African Centre for the Constructive Resolution of Disputes (ACCORD) with the theme ‘Towards a more coherent peacebuilding policy community’ in Johannesburg, South Africa on 19 and 20 February 2014. It is a complex and interdependent conflict management system. Peacebuilding is therefore any action taken by international or local actors which aims to consolidate peace in transition, stabilisation and post-conflict situations. International conflict management documents continue to highlight the complexity of peacebuilding and its coherency with other national development and statebuilding processes. This process is determined by several different approaches and mechanisms that aim to support countries to achieve long-term and sustainable peace. In the aftermath of conflicts, countries need to identify new ways in which to (re)build societies, infrastructure and institutions. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |